Prenatal Personhood, State Duties, and Congress's Abortion Power Under the Fourteenth Amendment
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Catholic University Law Review
Abstract
Many anti-abortion jurists have contended that by its original meaning, the Fourteenth Amendment not only (I) recognizes the personhood of prenatal human beings, but also (2) requires states to have and enforce the anti-abortion laws necessary to the equal protection of these prenatal persons, and even (3) empowers Congress to pass remedial anti-abortion laws where the states fail to protect such persons. In this essay, I will contend that the Amendment does indeed recognize the personhood of prenatal human beings, but largely leaves with the states the authority to determine the scope of the protection to be afforded such persons. More specifically, the evidence is clear and convincing that the Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, as originally understood, guarantee the prenatal person's life only against (I) state destruction, and (2) state refusal to enforce the laws, if any, that might protect such life. Therefore, Congress's abortion power extends no further than to remedy such state violence or state refusal to enforce-but does not interfere with the states' power to determine to what extent, if any, the laws will protect prenatal persons.
First Page
427
Last Page
448
Publication Date
Summer 2025
Recommended Citation
Upham, David R., "Prenatal Personhood, State Duties, and Congress's Abortion Power Under the Fourteenth Amendment" (2025). Faculty Articles. 351.
https://scholarship.stu.edu/faculty_articles/351