Why Meta Users Need a Public Advocate: A Modest Means to Address the Shortcomings of the Oversight Board
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Abstract
Meta took an unprecedented step in content moderation when it created an independent board, the Oversight Board, to adjudicate the company's decisions on contested posts. Whether that step constitutes a step forward in the ongoing struggle to moderate online communities depends on whether Meta iterates on its innovation. The current structure of the Oversight Board renders it unable to institute broad and necessary changes to Facebook and Instagram, Meta's main platforms. The creation of an Office of the Public Advocate, charged with representing the interests of Meta's users before the Board, would drastically improve the ability of the Board to positively change Meta's Community Standards. Such an office would serve as a model for other companies to emulate as users seek more influence over their online communities.
First Page
596
Last Page
622
Publication Date
Spring 2022
Recommended Citation
Kevin Frazier, Why Meta Users Need a Public Advocate: A Modest Means to Address the Shortcomings of the Oversight Board, 28 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 596 (2022).